{{tag>category:"OpenInsight 32-Bit" author:"Richard Hunt" author:"Don Miller - C3 Inc." author:"Donald Bakke" author:"Oystein Reigem"}}

[[https://www.revelation.com/the-works|Join The Works program to have access to the most current content, and to be able to ask questions and get answers from Revelation staff and the Revelation community]]


==== upgrade datatbl.dll only? (OpenInsight 32-Bit) ====
=== At 18 DEC 2002 12:52:17PM Richard Hunt wrote: ===
 
 
<QUOTE>
Using OI32 4.0.1, having problems with edit table "SELPOS".



Is it possible to upgrade the datatbl.dll only without upgrading anything else? My datatbl.dll is 122,368 02/06/2002. If so where would I find the upgrade?



I have the 4.1 and 4.1.2 upgrades, I just do not want to upgrade at this time. The zip files have "CAB" files in them, and I would guess that the only way to extract information is to do the whole upgrade. Yes?
</QUOTE>
----

=== At 18 DEC 2002 03:33PM Don Miller - C3 Inc. wrote:  ===

<QUOTE>The latest version of WinZip will extract one or more files from .CAB files.  I also think you can do it with a standard Windows utility .. just don't remember which and too lazy to look right now.  But it CAN be done.



Don M.

</QUOTE>

----

=== At 18 DEC 2002 07:10PM Donald Bakke wrote:  ===

<QUOTE>Richard,



I *know* you don't want to upgrade at this time but if memory serves 4.0.1 might have been a little flakey. 4.0.3 would be a better upgrade if you don't want to go all the way to 4.1.2 (which is my best recommendation).



dbakke@srpcs.com

[url=http://www.srpcs.com]SRP Computer Solutions, Inc.[/url]



[img]http://www.srpcs.com/srpicon1.gif[/img]

</QUOTE>

----

=== At 19 DEC 2002 03:33AM Oystein Reigem wrote:  ===

<QUOTE>Richard,



What kind of problems with SELPOS?



Never mind if you're sure they can't be circumvented.



- Oystein -



</QUOTE>

----

=== At 19 DEC 2002 10:54AM Richard Hunt wrote:  ===

<QUOTE>Ohhhhh neverrrrr minddddd!!! I just can't believe I do these things. A statement...   ROW += 1   just did me in!



I was using the following statements to unselect a row.



ET_FOCUS=@WINDOW:'.SELECTION'

HANDLE=GET_PROPERTY(ET_FOCUS,'HANDLE')

RESULT=SENDMESSAGE(HANDLE,1085,0,0)



Since my edit table is single select, the above way does not work! This way works.



ET_FOCUS=@WINDOW:'.SELECTION'

HANDLE=GET_PROPERTY(ET_FOCUS,'HANDLE')

ROW=SENDMESSAGE(HANDLE,1115,0,0)

RESULT=SENDMESSAGE(HANDLE,1083,0,ROW)



Note that the third argument, when 0 deselects, and when 1 selects.



And what caused me to overlook a long ago post from Don, was the fact that when I was getting the "ROW", I added 1 to it. Since I was using the row for other "non" "sendmessage" functions I had to add 1 to it.



Geeessss, I spent hours on this. I even did a work around that got the edit table "array" and then set the "array". I just did not like it because the edit table could have alot of rows. And since every other row is contrasted colored, I also had to set the color of every other row again.



Ok, all is fine now.

</QUOTE>

----

=== At 19 DEC 2002 04:19PM Oystein Reigem wrote:  ===

<QUOTE>Richard,



[i]Since I was using the row for other "non" "sendmessage" functions I had to add 1 to it.[/i]



Or you could simply have had two variables instead of one, like CurrentRow and NextRow, with NextRow=CurrentRow + 1. Variables are cheap.



- Oystein -



PS. Just gearing up to start teaching at the 101 programming course again. :-) :-) :-)



</QUOTE>

----

=== At 19 DEC 2002 08:15PM Richard Hunt wrote:  ===

<QUOTE>Sure could have. Remember that I did have a brain freeze. The killer is that it took me hours to figure the "ROW += 1" error. It was a "left over" statement.



I am now getting a good laugh about it. Although yesterday, I was about to throw things. :o)

</QUOTE>


[[https://www.revelation.com/revweb/oecgi4p.php/O4W_HANDOFF?DESTN=O4W_RUN_FORM&INQID=WORKS_READ&SUMMARY=1&KEY=BF5A2690451347E685256C9300622BB3|View this thread on the Works forum...]]