, ,

Join The Works program to have access to the most current content, and to be able to ask questions and get answers from Revelation staff and the Revelation community

Stricter Field Validation patterns (Arev32)

At 01 JUL 2008 10:21:29AM Mat Kelly wrote:

I'm converting an application from Arev31 to Arev32/OI. I have a validation pattern of (0,99999) on a field. In Arev31, it is loosely applied, apparently, to allow me to enter "500 (FLOW)" as a value and validates. Arev31 apparently matches the pattern at a minimum, i.e. as long as the field has a numeric value, all was good.

Arev32 is stricter with its validation, allowing numbers and only numbers. I wish to replicate the behavior of Arev31 in allowing a number + "(FLOW)" as a valid value. Is this possible to do with just a validation pattern or does a validation program need to be written?

Thanks.

At 01 JUL 2008 07:11PM Barry Stevens wrote:

I Tried:

(0,99999)' (FLOW) and this would not work Could only get this to work (0,99999) 1N' (FLOW)'

2N' (FLOW)' 3N' (FLOW)'

4N' (FLOW)' 5N' (FLOW)'

View this thread on the Works forum...