third_party_content:community:commentary:forums_nonworks:c8995eadc49b29eb85256cb9007fef02

Sign up on the Revelation Software website to have access to the most current content, and to be able to ask questions and get answers from the Revelation community

At 25 JAN 2003 06:17:22PM Larry Wilson wrote:

I have a client that has a new Win2K Server with SP3 installed. Plenty of memory, hard drive, etc.

The problem is that they are getting lots of link list errors and a few GFEs in the index files. The MS Network monitor says there are no hardware-related bad frames, but that, once the buffers reach 2048, there are lots of frames lost due to buffer-full problems.

Their network guy says he doesn't know where, in Win2K, or if the buffer problem can be fixed. This happens without AREV even running.

Any ideas/suggestions? I am not a Win2K person, so I would appreciate help with this.

Larry Wilson

webmaster@AdvancedRevelation.com

BTW, I have a new phone #: 972-768-2965


At 26 JAN 2003 01:58AM [url=http://www.sprezzatura.com]The Sprezzatura Group[/url] wrote:

Larry - are you using the Revelation NT / Windows 2000 service?

Steve

The Sprezzatura Group

World Leaders in all things RevSoft


At 26 JAN 2003 03:46AM Warren wrote:

What buffers are you talking about?

TCP/IP, disk i/o, or the Network Monitor capture buffer?


At 26 JAN 2003 10:21PM Larry Wilson wrote:

No, the client is not. The server is dropping frames without AREV even running; would the NT service somehow check to see if the write does not take place properly?


At 26 JAN 2003 10:35PM Larry Wilson wrote:

In the Microsoft Network Monitor:

On the right side, the Captured Statistics - the line that says:

Frames lost when buffer exceeded - (after running a day, it's ] 1M)

The frames captured are just a few thousand greater.

Frames in buffer are 2048.

% buffer utilized: 100%

# frames dropped: 0

Under Network Statistics, Frames dropped says 14K.


At 27 JAN 2003 03:21AM [url=http://www.sprezzatura.com]The Sprezzatura Group[/url] wrote:

Check the network card isn't running "burst" mode.

I'd recommend you install the Windows 2000 Service product - it tends to make things much less vulnerable to network problems or write caching, and assists with providing rock solid I/O.

Steve

The Sprezzatura Group

World Leaders in all things RevSoft


At 27 JAN 2003 12:02PM Warren wrote:

Sounds like it's related to this

JSI Tip 1496

Going from memory in WinNT server there is a setting in the Control Panels - Network - Server to 'optimize' the server resource usage for file sharing, applications server, etc.

Sorry I don't have access a NT or W2K server at the moment so I can't be more precise. The server guy should know what I'm talking about though. Try changing these settings?

View this thread on the forum...

  • third_party_content/community/commentary/forums_nonworks/c8995eadc49b29eb85256cb9007fef02.txt
  • Last modified: 2023/12/28 07:40
  • by 127.0.0.1