Join The Works program to have access to the most current content, and to be able to ask questions and get answers from Revelation staff and the Revelation community

At 02 AUG 2005 07:34:50PM dsig _at_ sigafoos.org wrote:

tracker down so will post here before i forget

the basic parser .. could it be enhanced to fail on first instance ?

if not(assinged(var)) OR var=' then

this will fail on the second part even if the first part finds it. At least that is what appears here.

Could this be enhanced to fail first test and not do second test .. ??

thanks

DSig


At 03 AUG 2005 10:22AM Sean FitzSimons wrote:

Dave,

I'll put this one into the Suggestion Box for future review.

Thanks,

Sean


At 03 AUG 2005 06:23PM Warren Auyong wrote:

I guess that's why most code I've seen has:

If Unassigned(var) then var='


At 03 AUG 2005 06:29PM dsig _at_ sigafoos.org wrote:

Yeah .. it would just be nice to have

if not(assigne(a)) OR a=NULL$ then

instead of

if not(assigned(a)) then a=NULL$

if a=NULL$ then

only 1 less line .. but more in line with 20th century programming languages .. well except for mv languages which well all know barely made the 19th century


At 03 AUG 2005 06:43PM Warren Auyong wrote:

Didn't the 19th century have true optimizing compilers or was that the 18th century ?


At 03 AUG 2005 08:51PM dsig _at_ sigafoos.org wrote:

depends if you worked in MV or not. But they did have those nice astrix across the screen .. oh technology ..

compilation complete!!

View this thread on the Works forum...

  • third_party_content/community/commentary/forums_works/6407b1b7883c5158852570510081883a.txt
  • Last modified: 2023/12/30 11:57
  • by 127.0.0.1