Join The Works program to have access to the most current content, and to be able to ask questions and get answers from Revelation staff and the Revelation community

At 20 JAN 2000 09:29:35AM Donald Bakke wrote:

We have an open support call on this subject but I wanted to tap into the developer's experience out there. We seem to be having trouble using the COPY_TABLE statement when attempting to do a DATA only copy.

Near as I can tell the only requirement is to specify "DATA.tablename]" in the source table parameter. It never seems to work for us. However, we do seem to be able to use the "DICT.tablename]".

This is OI 3.7.2 and we are using a Development system.

Any ideas? Thanks.

[email protected]

SRP Computer Solutions


At 20 JAN 2000 09:53AM [url=http://www.sprezzatura.com]The Sprezzatura Group[/url] wrote:

When you use the DICT. or DATA. prefixes for the original table name, you must use the same prefix for the new table name.

Copy_Table( "[b]DATA.[/b]MYFILE","DATAVOL","MYAPP","[b]DATA.[/b]NEWNAME" )

For those that are wondering why this requirement, is basically there for the little used user specification functionality.

The Sprezzatura Group

[/i]World leaders in all things RevSoft[/i]

www.sprezzatura.com_zz.jpg


At 20 JAN 2000 09:58AM WinWin/Revelation Support wrote:

Don-

For Data Only, try:

Copy_table('DATA.MYTABLE', 'C:\FOOBAR', @APPID, 'DATA.MYNEWTABLE', ,,,,,)

hope this helps-

Mike Ruane


At 21 JAN 2000 12:54AM Donald Bakke wrote:

Sprezz/WinWin,

Thanks for the info, it worked. BTW, Revelation also came back today with the correct answer.

[email protected]

SRP Computer Solutions

View this thread on the Works forum...

  • third_party_content/community/commentary/forums_works/b80ea46b97607b548525686c004f9cf4.txt
  • Last modified: 2024/01/04 20:57
  • by 127.0.0.1