SORTERCOL (OpenInsight 32-Bit)
At 25 APR 2002 08:33:27PM Jim Vaughan wrote:
It seems the behavior of the SORTEDCOL property has changed under the 32-bit code.
It used to be if you sorted on column 1 and then sorted on column 2. The data would be sorted by column 2 and sub-sorted by column 1. The data is no longer sub-sorted by column 1.
Could this be fixed or does anyone have any easy workarounds?
At 26 APR 2002 12:15PM Sean FitzSimons wrote:
Jim,
We have duplicated/verified the error and will fix.
Thank you,
Sean
At 26 APR 2002 08:54PM Jim Vaughan wrote:
Let me know if you have anything I could test.
At 27 APR 2002 02:09PM Mike Ruane wrote:
Jim-
Send me an email- [email protected] - we have a new datatbl.dll for you to test.
Thanks-
Mike
At 28 APR 2002 05:36AM j Vaughan wrote:
Will do…
… and thanks.
At 30 APR 2002 01:08PM Mike Ruane wrote:
Jim has indicated that the latest version of the datatbl.dll works correctly with Sortedcol.
We will be releasing this as part of the 4.1 release, scheduled for later this year. If anyone would like it earlier, please email [email protected] and request the new datatbl.dll
Thanks
At 30 APR 2002 05:20PM [email protected] wrote:
Micheal ..
I am sure this has been said before .. but I just wanted to take a moment and tell you how happy/impressed I am with your the RTI boys and girls response to issues like this.
It does bring more faith to my decision to relook the OI solutions. Along with other things we have discussed .. this response (and others) are great.
Thank you very much …
[email protected] onmouseover=window.status=the new revelation technology .. a refreshing change;return(true)"
David Tod Sigafoos ~ SigSolutions
Phone: 503-639-4240
At 30 APR 2002 07:10PM j Vaughan wrote:
My only complaint is, why wasn't it like this 5 years ago! What on earth was RevTI doing?
They are indeed great to work with.
At 01 MAY 2002 04:19AM Ray Chan wrote:
Mike,
I just replaced the DATATBL.DLL dated 3/26/02 with the most recent dated 4/30/02.
When I went to my edittable and entered a date (e.g., 1/1, etc.) in the first column, I got some invalid message regarding the date. When I put back DATATBL.DLL dated 3/26/02, everything was A-Okay.
Hope this helps. Let me know if you need more info.
Ray
At 01 MAY 2002 10:49AM Mike Ruane wrote:
Ray (and all)
I think we shipped you the DLL with Unicode enabled- without the rest of the Unicode support supplied.
I've already sent the new dll via email.
Thanks-
Mike
At 01 MAY 2002 03:49PM j Vaughan wrote:
Which version do I have?
At 01 MAY 2002 03:55PM j Vaughan wrote:
I seem to have the same problem, could you email me the fix as well.